Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Criminal Litigation Process - Free Essay Example

Criminal litigation process This question raises issues of the criminal litigation process as well as evidential issues involved during the questioning of suspects and subsequent litigation. In the interests of proper case analysis, I have decided to deal with the parties in turn by considering the legal issues that arise in relation to each partys case. R v. Sir Joseph Priestley Sir Joseph Priestley has been convicted of indecent exposure based on evidence given by Ms. Amanda Robert. The case has been heard in a Magistrates Court by a sole magistrate. Sir Joseph Priestley now wishes to appeal against the decision of the magistrate. In advising Sir Joseph Priestley, the first issue to be touched upon is the right of appeal in decisions rendered by the magistrates courts. A decision of a magistrates court can be challenged in one of three ways: firstly, by an appeal to the Crown Court; secondly, by an appeal to the High Court by way of case stated by the magistrates for the high courts opinion, or on application to the High Court for judicial review. In this case, Sir Joseph Priestley will be advised to proceed on the basis of an appeal to the High Court by way of case stated. Most appeals by way of case stated are aimed at overturning either a summary acquittal or conviction, as in the case of Sir Joseph Priestley, a conviction. Appeals by way of ca se stated is governed by the Magistrates Court Act 1980 and section 111(1) provides that any person who was a party to any proceeding before a magistrates court or is aggrieved by the conviction of the court may question the proceeding on the ground that it is wrong in law or in excess of the courts jurisdiction. Sir Joseph Priestleys application will be made on the basis that District Judge Asquiths decision is wrong in law. The basis for such a conclusion is premised on the substantial evidential issues arising during the course of the trial. In his summing up, the District Judge alluded to three issues which deserve our attention. The first is his statement regarding the veracity of Ms Robert as a truthful witness. DJ Asquith refers to the witnesss evidence as corroborated as a result of her fragrant appearance. Such a statement is not of itself improper but it gives cause for concern when the only corroboration of the witnesss account of events is her fragrant appearanc e. In this case, the appropriate method of corroboration might have been through other witnesses who saw the offence committed or through witnesses who know the accused or the victim and can testify as to their veracity for the truth. The issue here is simple à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" the victims evidence has not been tested and it is unsafe to convict Sir Joseph Priestley based on this untested evidence. Secondly, as to the issue of Sir Joseph Priestleys defence of mistaken identity, DJ Asquith suggests in his speech that the burden of proving this defence lies on the accused à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" that is clearly not the case. The general rule with regards to the burden of proof in criminal cases is that the burden is on the prosecution to prove the defendants guilt beyond reasonable doubt. There is a statutory exception to the rule which is contained in section 101 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 which basically surmises that in a summary trial where the defendant relies for a def ence on any statutory exception, exemption, provision or qualification to the statutory offence charged, the burden of proving that exception is on the defendant. In this case, Sir Joseph Priestleys defence is not an exception or provision forming part of the offence charged. It is simply a defence of mistaken identity to the offence charged and which forms part of the case that the prosecution has to prove. While Sir Joseph Priestley had the evidential burden of raising the defence, it was for the prosecution to disprove such a defence. It was clearly wrong for DJ Asquith to cast the burden of proving the mistaken identity on Sir Joseph Priestley and this clearly provides a basis upon which an appeal can be sought. Thirdly, with respect to the Judges reference to Sir Joseph Priestleys refusal to discuss the facts of the case during police interrogation, we must consider the effect of section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 ( CJPOA) which deals with the defendants failure to mention facts when questioned or charged. In such a case where the defendant has been questioned and he has not responded to those questions, the tribunal of fact may draw such inferences as appear proper from the defendants refusal to mention those facts which he later seeks to rely on. However this present case must be distinguished from the classic section 34 cases such as R v Condron and R v Cowan because Sir Joseph Priestley clearly stated during interview that it was a case of mistaken identity. Assuming that it truly was a case of mistaken identity, then there would have been nothing further to discuss during interview and the judge would be wrong in drawing the inferences from Sir Joseph Priestleys interview with the police. Another point which must be discussed is the fact that despite alluding to the defence of mistaken identity during police interrogation, the police did not conduct further investigations to enquire whether anyone else on t he train might have witnessed the crime. One would imagine that travelling from Buckinghamshire everyday to Neasden, Sir Joseph Priestley would have established a travel pattern which would yield the possibility of discovering regular travel companions who might know about Sir Joseph Priestley and whether he has ever engaged in such an act. The inability of the police to yield additional evidence to support the Ms Roberts case seems to be particularly detrimental in proving the case against Sir Joseph Priestley. It would therefore seem that Sir Joseph Priestley has a good chance of overturning the conviction on appeal. R v. Mr. Harry Collingwood and Mr. Fred Vaughan The facts reveal that both Fred and Harry have been convicted of the crimes of murder and conspiracy to cause explosions. They now seek to appeal against their convictions. The issue raised here is whether the conviction is safe in the light of the evidential shortcomings displayed during the criminal litigation process. The general rule with respect to appeals from the crown court is encapsulated within section 2 of the Criminal Appeals Act 1995. This section states that a person convicted on indictment may appeal on the single ground that the conviction is unsafe. In the case of R v. Chalkley, the Court considered the definition of unsafe and suggested that it was more or less a subjective question of whether there still remained a lurking doubt in the minds of people which made them wonder whether an injustice has been done. There are a number of issues which must be discussed in the light of the conclusion that the conviction appears to be unsafe. The first issue relate s to the procedure followed during the interrogation of both Fred and Harry. The facts reveal that during questioning, both parties were denied access to a solicitor. The general rule with respect to rights of suspects to legal advice is contained within section 58 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). Section 58 provides that a person who is arrested and held in custody at a police station has a right, at his request, to consult privately with a solicitor at any time. Furthermore, Article 6(3) of the ECHR requires that consultation with a legal adviser must take place out of the hearing of a third party. Fred and Harry therefore ought to have been informed of their right to see a solicitor upon arriving at the police station, and they also had the right to consult with solicitors without the presence of Inspector Lewis or any other third party. The refusal of the right to consult with a solicitor is clearly grounds for the exclusion of the evidence obtained as a result of the denial of the accuseds right. The second issue relates to the refusal by the police to allow both Fred and Harry inform a family member of their whereabouts. Under PACE, section 56(1) the suspect has the right to have a friend or family member informed of the arrest. However this right may be delayed in certain circumstances. One of such circumstances might be where the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that such friend or family member may interfere with the evidence connected with an offence, thus hampering the police investigation. It would therefore appear that in this case the police might have been justified in refusing both Fred and Harry the right to inform family members of their whereabouts. The third issue here relates to the apparent physical threats made by Inspector Lewis to both Fred and Harry and the manner and condition under which the confessions were made. The threats and the manner of eliciting the confessions can be said to am ount to oppression. Oppression is defined in section 76(8) of PACE as torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, and the use or threat of violence. In 1968, Lord MacDermott commented to the Bentham Club that: oppressive questioning is questioning which by its very nature excites hopes or fears or so affects the mind of the suspect that his will crumbles and he speaks when otherwise he would have remained silent. While PACE does not define any of the three concepts of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, one can look to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in The Greek Case where the commission defined inhuman treatment as such treatment as deliberately causing severe suffering, mental or physical and degrading treatment as treatment which grossly humiliates the individual before others or drives him to act against his will or conscience. Furthermore in the case if Republic of Ireland v. United Kingdom the court was concerned with certain techniques of interr ogation used upon suspects in detention which included wall standing, hooding, deprivation of sleep, food and drink. In this case, the court held that the techniques amounted to inhuman treatment because they caused physical and mental suffering and also led to acute psychiatric disturbances during interrogation. Relying on the above decisions, it can be said that the station house treatment of both Fred and Harry amounted to inhuman treatment and the nature of the questioning was clearly oppressive. In the light of this fact, the next logical question to be decided falls to be: Of what evidential value is the confession purported to have been signed by both Fred and Harry. Having determined that the confession was the product of oppressive questioning, we now turn to look at section 76 of PACE. Firstly as with all confessions made to the police, if the prosecution wishes to rely on it, they must satisfy the rule of admissibility that is in section 76(2). In this case, the Judge should have proceeded to hear issues as to the admissibility of the confession in a separate proceeding known as the voir dire, or the trial within the trial and then deciding as to whether or not the evidence ought to be allowed in. Failing to do this, the judge clearly breached the procedural rules relating to the admission of evidence and this clearly presents a ground for challenging the conviction. The next issue concerns the joint trial of Fred and Harry, where both defendants rely on different defences. What exactly do I mean? Well we need to examine what section 76(1) of PACE states. It states that a confession made by an accused is admissible against him. This shows that it is only admissible against its maker and not against any other person including a co-accused who may be named in the confession. In this case, the learned judge has not used his discretion to order separate trials, give a limiting warning to the jury or sought to edit the confession so tha t it does not implicate Harry Collingwood, whose defence is that he was not present at the time of the bombings, but was in china on vacation. Once again, such flagrant disregard for criminal procedure by Mr. Justice Jeffreys lends credible support to the conclusion that the criminal procedural system was so flawed as to render the convictions unsafe. The final issue to be touched upon relates to the unusual nature of the Judges summing up to the Jury. As it has been noted in Blackstones Criminal Practice 2008, errors resulting the judges summing up are clearly capable of rendering a conviction unsafe. It is therefore necessary to carefully dissect the summing up in this case to see where the judge erred. The first issue to be raised with the summing up is that of the burden of proof. While the Judge makes mention of the fact that the burden of proof is on the prosecution, he fails to mention the standard to which the burden must be proven. Secondly, the Judges statement s that the Jury ought to disregard Ms Lopezs testimony without any proper basis for its dismissal is clearly erroneous in the light of the fact that the law clearly states that the judge has a general duty to remind the jury of the evidence, and as part of that duty. He has got to remind them of the defence case à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Ms. Lopezs alibi of Mr. Collingwood forms part of the defence case for Mr. Collingwood and the judge ought not to have made light of the fact that love is blind and can lead people to do silly things which clearly forms a bias against Ms. Lopezs testimony. Overall, the judges summing up was clearly biased and in favour of the Prosecution. The judges statement that the prosecution evidence is best corroborated by the jurys knowledge of the world is clearly erroneous and devoid of proper reasoning or sound legal knowledge. Any corroboration that the jury might need ought to have been in the evidence presented, and not in any external factors such as their knowledge of the world. In the case of Berrada, the judge referred to defence allegations which suggested that police had fabricated evidence as really monstrous and wicked. On Appeal, it was decidedly stated that in directing the jury, the judge has a duty to state matters impartially, clearly and logically and not inappropriately to inflate evidence to sarcastic and inappropriate comment. Similarly in R v. Marr, the judges dismissive attitude towards a large volume of character evidence had been held as grounds for having the conviction quashed. Although in the case of ODonnell, it was held that the judge should be allowed some leeway in commenting upon the evidence and in the case of Canny, it was held that a conviction will be in danger only when the judge crosses the line into blatant unfairness and apparent pro-prosecution bias. Applying the above cases to the present scenario, it is my opinion that the comments of the judge, during summing up, do clearly cro ss the line into blatant unfairness and prosecution bias as demonstrated in Canny. The judge could not be described as having been fair in his summing up, and if even allowed some lee way in commenting upon the summing up, his comments could not be described as harmless, but at best, were designed to perpetrate his politically minded agenda which showed a heavy disdain for political activists. However he failed to note that the bench is not the place to perpetrate such an agenda and that he has to remain neutral at all times during the course of the trial. The judge clearly did not achieve this level of fairness and as such the conviction of both Fred and Harry must be said to be unsafe and dangerous and warrants an immediate appeal. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1) Peter Murphy, Blackstones, Criminal Practice, 2007, Blackstone Press. 2) Roderick Munday, Evidence, 2005, Third edition, Oxford University Press 3) Ian Dennis, The Law of Evidence, 2003, Second Edition, Sweet Maxwell. 4) Adrian Keane, The Modern Law of Evidence, 2005, Sixth Edition, Lexis Nexis 5) Peter Hungerford-Welch, Criminal Litigation Sentencing, 2004, Sixth Edition, Routledge Cavendish.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Judicial Review The Face Of Legislative Inertia - 799 Words

Some might question why, even in the face of legislative inertia, courts can be trusted to resolve difficult legal questions. This argument misses the mark. First, the Court should decide legal questions that are suited for judicial review and that result in workable rules to guide lower courts, regardless of outcomes. In other words, this test speaks to ensuring fairer processes, not favorable outcomes. As Professor Issacharoff states, an â€Å"individual or a group should be allowed to participate in political decisionmaking regardless of whether it will make any difference to the result.† Other may claim this proposal would open the floodgates to litigation and unduly burden the federal courts. Such an argument fails to account for the substantial burden that this test places on litigants. Indeed, access to the courts would only slightly increase for a discreet class of litigants who can make a prima facie case that a challenged law violates a constitutional right. The additional requirements – the unavailability of redress in the legislature and the workability of a judicial resolution – would ensure that only meritorious cases presenting issues particularly suitable for judicial review would be heard. The upshot is that a relatively small but significant number of litigants would gain access the courts. In doing so, courts would strike to protect politically powerless and traditionally disadvantaged groups who are vulnerable to the abuses of entrenchedShow MoreRelatedThe Function of the Judiciary Within the Constitution of the United Kingdom2659 Words   |  11 PagesStephen lifted the veil in a way that might come as a surprise to those who suppose that judicial candour is a particularly modern prerogative: every decision on a debated point adds a little to the law by making that point certain for the future. Indeed, whichever way this case may be decided, it will settle the law upon precise point involved, and it is this which gives to judicial decisions their great importance[4] Yet, we still have not fully explored the implicationsRead Moretexas constution11227 Words   |  45 Pagesdesigners never completely rewrite the constitution with which they start. Fundamental and piecemeal changes as well as carry-over from previous constitutions are clearly evident in the seven constitutions under which Texas has been governed. Next, we review the structure and content of the current Texas constitution. Of special concern here is the length, detail and overall organization (or disorganization, as some critics might have it) of the fundamental plan of state government and cornerstone ofRead MoreDeveloping an Effective and Efficient Tax System in a Developing Economy - a Case Study of Ghana29843 Words   |  120 Pages |4-5 | |1.3 | |Significance of the study |5-6 | |CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW | |2.0 | |Introduction |7 Read MoreOverview of Hrm93778 Words   |  376 PagesDiscipline HR auditing Copyright  © Virtual University of Pakistan 5 Human Resource Management (MGT501) 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. HR control process Leadership Leadership in organization Employee separation International dimension of HRM Conclusion Review. VU Key Terms Human Resource Management The staffing functions of the management process. Or the policies and practices needed to carry out the â€Å"people† or human resource aspects of a management position, including recruiting, screening, trainingRead MoreExploring Corporate Strategy - Case164366 Words   |  658 PagesMark Rodol, took over as chief executive and launched a strategic review of the whole business. Rodol commented on Palumbo’s exit: James is an entrepreneur – but what is going to make this business great is a focused, long-term brand strategy. To his credit James has had the foresight to step aside and let the people who understand and believe this run the company. It’s about a difference in style.6 As to the strategic review, Rodol observed: Over the years, we’ve pursued a number of opportunities

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Essay on The Pauline Epistles I - 1141 Words

This letter was written a few months after the first. A date from 55-56 AD is generally accepted for this letter. Timothy had not met with much success and Paul wrote this letter to further his position in the first letter and to address concerns that arose out of his previous epistles. The second Letter to the Church at Corinth is the supplement of the first. It is due to the same circumstances which called out the first, and to the effects that were produced in the church at Corinth by the receipt of the first letter. (Johnson) Biblical times were not the age of great strides in communication. Letters were very powerful means to convey one’s thoughts. God deemed it necessary to reveal Himself in these Epistles of Paul. This letter†¦show more content†¦It was written in 62 A.D. â€Å"It was probably written to meet certain difficulties which were arising in the church.† (Johnson) Among other subjects this epistle touches upon the blessings and riches available to the true believer. Equality among Christians as His children and inhabitants of His Kingdom is stressed. Paul supplies us with the knowledge of our God given armor. This armor is needed to protect us from Satan. PHILIPPIANS Paul wrote to his brethren in Philippi around 63 A.D.†It was written from the city of Rome, during the first imprisonment of Paul, and probably towards its close, perhaps in the year A.D. 63.† (Johnson) Philippians gives an example of Christian love and generosity. This is a letter full of joy and praise. Paul teaches us that growing from a point of understanding in Jesus we can receive the underpinning needed to sustain us in our search for Christianity (being like Christ). COLOSSIANS This epistle was written in 62 A.D. to the faithful at Colossae. â€Å"The date was probably about four years after his parting with the Ephesian elders at Miletus (Ac 20:6-38), about A.D. 62, before his imprisonment had become of the more severe kind, which appears in his Epistle to the Philippians.† (Jamieson, Fausset, Brown) There are a group of gospels which support the theory known as Gnosticism. These gospels are not canonical and are disregarded by most scholars. Paul was combating an early form of Gnosticism and early errors inShow MoreRelatedThe Pauline Epistles I Essay2203 Words   |  9 Pagesknowledge of the apostolic work of Paul comes first from the Book of Acts. The epistles written by Paul serve to further our knowledge of his mission. These letters were written to churches that he had founded or churches that were known to him. Luke’s account of Paul introduces us to the basic facts about this important biblical figure. A more complete understanding of Paul’s journeys can be gleaned from his letters. These e pistles were written almost at the time they occurred and they comprise some ofRead MoreA Report on the Pauline Epistles3044 Words   |  12 Pagesï » ¿Over the course of the thirteen Pauline epistles, the author (presumably Paul) instructs his readers regarding not only the proper functioning of a marriage and family, but he also uses the concept and codes of familial life to describe the duties and experiences of a Christian. Thus, one cannot consider the epistles teachings on marriage and the family without considering how these descriptions of the family are integrated into the larger ideological framework produced by the letters, and as suchRead MoreJournal Article Critique Of John G Pauline Cosmic Christology And Ecological Crisis Essay1103 Words   |  5 Pages LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY Journal Article Critique of Gibbs, John G. â€Å"Pauline Cosmic Christology and Ecological Crisis.† Journal of Biblical Literature (December 1971): 466-479. Submitted to Dr. Michael Chiavone, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of THEO 510-D01 Survey of Theology by Todd Bush November 6, 2016 Contents Introduction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...3 Brief Summary†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.3 Critical Interaction†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Read MoreThe Paper Is Centered On The Discussion Of The New Testament1657 Words   |  7 PagesThe paper is centered on the discussion of the New Testament Letter Structures, specifically the Epistles. Style, format, and authorship will be some of the main points of discussion. How is the reader to use this information to determine, not just who the author is, but to whom is the author speaking too? The letter or epistle, what unique style shows that the author is original or a pseudo author writing in the same style as the original author. Any similarities of the writing style and contentRead MorePauls letter to the Galatians Essay1103 Words   |  5 PagesOUTLINE I. When and where Galatians was written II. Why Galatians was written III. Who wrote Galatians IV. Pauls stand on his authority in the Letter to the Galatians V. The primary themes of the book of Galatians VI. Conclusion Pauls Letter to the Galatians Where, when, why, and by whom Galatians was written as well as the issue, of Pauls authority, addressed by him in his letter and the primary themes are all important in order to understand this book. quot;The Letter of PaulRead MoreImportant Issues in the Non-Pauline Churches1539 Words   |  7 PagesIssues in the Non-Pauline Churches December 3, 2013 Important Issues in the Non-Pauline Churches Even though many Christians are not aware of the problems, there are issues in the non-Pauline churches because the scriptures point out several and the author address them. This paper will focus on those issues found in the non-Pauline letters which were written to the churches of that day. Then those issues will be compared to the issues which are found in the Pauline letters. ManyRead MorePauls View On The Church1480 Words   |  6 Pagesprominent teachings of Paul is regarding on the subject of the church. Not only did he write letters to church but in many occasion talked about what the church is. But the question that often brings up is â€Å"What is the church?† In the following paper I will lay out what Paul believes and describes of what the church is, and what the church does. What is the Church? There are key references in the Bible that Paul talks about regard the church: Ephesians 1:22-23; 2:11-22; 3:3-9, Colossians 1:24-27;Read MoreGeneral Epistles: Books and Issues Covered943 Words   |  4 PagesGeneral Epistles The epistles were letters that various of the apostles wrote, generally, to different congregations or to individuals they wished to encourage. All of the Pauline Epistles were either written to a specific church (Ephesians/Ephesus, Galatians/Galatia, etc.) or to an individual such as Timothy or Philemon. However, there were general letters written by individuals that were not originally meant for a specific group of people. These are called the General Epistles since they wereRead MoreAnalysis Of Ephesians 4, By The Apostle Paul Essay1518 Words   |  7 PagesUpon our arrival to Ephesians 4, we come to an epistle that many believe was penned by the Apostle Paul while being held in prison. In writing this letter, his primary audience is to a group of churches in 1st century Ephesus. It is important to note that in the historical context in which this letter is written, Christianity was not the popular religious belief of the nation. But rather, Ephesus was an extremely diverse cult ure in its religious practices throughout the city. As a result of thisRead MoreIntroduction Of The New Testament Essay2971 Words   |  12 Pagesï » ¿Introduction of the New Testament Summary of introduction to the new testament Louis Berkof by systematically addressing the origin of the Gospel and the Epistles of the New Testament, their content, characteristics, authorship, composition, and canonical significance,   Takes on the difficult undertaking of ensuring that the New Testament is accurately understood within what he perceives is the correct historical setting. Berkhof primarily intended this book for his students at Calvin Theological

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Human Development Essay Example For Students

Human Development Essay Human Development Essay is very important in terms of living conditions in different countries. The statement any society committed to improving the lives of its people must also be committed to full and equal rights for all is true. The UN considers three factors to calculate human development in a country. These factors cover many aspects of a country, including social development in a country. Income, education, and healthy living are considered to be the most important factors in human development, which help to rid populations of poverty, and support human rights. First, the improvement of lives is directly related to human rights. According to the 2000 UN Human Development Report, a more developed country with more rights today, as opposed to 1970, can expect a newborn to live 10 more years, adult literacy cut in half, and infant mortality rates cut by over 40%. The more freedom and rights a person has, the more opportunity, and better chance for a good standard of living. The International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights declared that the rights to food, health, education and privacy were fundamental building blocks of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Humans, then, can realize what they are capable of achieving. However, a less developed country with less freedom, demotivates people and takes away opportunity for one to achieve their best. Once she found a group of friends to join she started dating. Anne became sexually involved with her first boyfriend and became pregnant. She decided that it would be best to terminate the pregnancy and continue on with school. The psychosocial crisis for this life stage is group identity versus alienation. Anne started this stage alienated from society. She did not have any real friends and was often by herself. Toward the end of this stage she began to identify with a group a people who became her friends. Because she had been alienated from society previously she fell prey to peer pressure in order to remain a member of the group. She was pressured into having sex, which led to the pregnancy. All of these factors led to the core pathology of dissociation. She has trouble keeping friends and is not completely comfortable dating. Currently Anne is in the Later Adolescence stage of development. She is learning to be out on her own for the first time in her life. Because she is away at school she does not have the guidance that her parents once gave her. She has to make decisions about her life and life choices. So far she has not had much success in making these choices. She almost decided to quit school and move in with her boyfriend. This poor planning has left her very behind in school making her have to attend for an extra year in order to graduate. She also decided that it was all right to smoke marijuana. This led to problems with the law, which is not good considering that she is a criminal justice major. Next year she will be moving into an apartment and will have to work in order to support herself. This is another step toward autonomy from her parents. Anne is figuring out the different aspects of her gender identity. She is taking on new life roles everyday. She must balance her time between being a student, friend, co-worker, lover, all the while making the transition from child to adult. She has been having trouble making the transition from childhood to adulthood. After high school she was holding on to her childhood for dear life but now is learning how to let go and move on. Now that she is on her own Anne must make decisions about what she feels are her values and morals. She is now deciding what she feels is right and what is wrong. Anne is finding out what causes she wants to support and what she wants to fight against. She is becoming aware of the fact that there are consequences for every one of her actions. She has decided that it is no longer a good idea to do drugs and party every night because it affects her studies. The last of the developmental tasks that she must deal with is finding a career. She decided that after high school she wanted to continue her education and go on to college. Anne was originally a Biology major but found that she preferred Criminal Justice instead. Anne is taking steps toward graduation and building a resume in order to find a job in the future. Authority Vs Individuality Essay She is now taking her studies seriously to insure that she will graduate. She .